Pip: From The Back Porch, where the view stretches all the way back to the colonial era — and apparently the commute to relevance is shorter than you’d think.

Mara: Bob has been teaching a Bible study series on how Christianity and the Great Awakening shaped the founding of the United States, and these posts cover the full arc — from the first colonists arriving with scripture in hand, through revival, and into revolution.

Pip: Let’s start with how faith rose, faded, and came roaring back in colonial America.

Revelry, Rapaciousness, Reason — and Revival

Mara: This segment traces a cycle the colonists lived through — prosperity eroding faith, moral decline following, and then a revival that changed everything. The question is how a society slides from devotion to decay, and what pulls it back.

Pip: The anchor post opens with a line from Cotton Mather that sets the whole argument in motion: “Religion brought forth Prosperity, and the daughter destroyed the mother.”

Mara: That quote is from 1702, and it maps directly onto what the post describes — the more prosperous the colonies became, the more their rapacious desires pushed faith aside in pursuit of wealth.

Pip: So the pattern is: blessings arrive, gratitude fades, greed fills the gap. Mather diagnosed it three centuries ago and the post argues he is still right.

Mara: The earlier post, “Coming to America,” establishes where the faith came from in the first place. Columbus, the Pilgrims, the Puritans — they arrived believing they were doing the will of God, carrying both the Genesis directive to fill the earth and the Great Commission.

Pip: And then, as “The Slow Fade of Faith” documents, the next generation simply did not share their parents’ zeal. The post draws the parallel plainly — September 11 bound Americans together in shared faith, and then, as the threat faded, so did the commitment.

Mara: The post describes that era as offering what it calls “a watered-down faith — a cheap grace if you will,” and argues the early 1700s were as ripe for revival as the early 2000s are now.

Pip: Enter Jonathan Edwards, who apparently had a gift for making grace feel urgent.

Mara: The anchor post describes him as a Jeremiad preacher who brought both the fear of God and the supply of grace freely offered through the love and blood of Jesus. His book, “A Faithful Narrative of the Surprizing Work of God,” became the blueprint used by George Whitefield and others who ignited the Great Awakening.

Pip: And “The Great Awakening” post shows what that ignition produced — a revival running roughly from the 1730s through the 1760s that, beyond saving souls, broke down denominational barriers and fostered what the post calls a democratic spirit that helped pave the philosophical way for the American Revolution.

Mara: Which is exactly where the next segment picks up — what the preachers and founders did with that spirit once it caught fire.

Pulpits, Patriots, and the Sacred Foundation

Mara: By the time of the Revolution, the question was whether the theological energy of the Awakening would translate into political action — and a group of ministers made sure it did.

Pip: Peter Oliver, the last royal Chief Justice of Massachusetts, put it in terms the British understood: “But as little as the red Regiments performed, the black Regiment played its Artillery to some purpose; and The Pulpit — Drum Eccliastick — Was beat with Fist instead of a Stick.”

Mara: That contempt is actually a compliment in disguise. The Black Robed Regiment, as they came to be known, were feared more than the colonial military because they gave the Revolution its moral and theological frame.

Pip: And “Faith of Our Founding Fathers” asks the harder follow-up: what did the men who wrote the founding documents actually believe?

Mara: That post works through the full range — Christian, Deist, Unitarian, Theistic Rationalist — and holds them to scrutiny, as the series puts it, “warts and all.” The goal is not to exalt the founders but to understand how their beliefs shaped what they built.

---

Pip: The through-line here is that the same cycle — devotion, drift, decay, renewal — keeps recurring, and the posts are asking whether we recognize where we are in it.

Mara: Next time, we’ll see where the series goes from here. There’s still a revolution to finish.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Pip: From The Back Porch, with a view of the Sermon on the Mount — and Bob has been working through it one beatitude at a time.

Mara: This episode covers the whole arc of that study, from the introductory framing of Kingdom living all the way through poverty of spirit, mourning, meekness, hunger for righteousness, and mercy. Let’s start with the beatitudes themselves and what they reveal about inner posture.

Beatitudes And Inner Posture

Pip: The Beatitudes are not a to-do list. That’s the frame here — Jesus is describing who Kingdom people are, not handing down a new set of commandments.

Mara: The post on Matthew 5:3 sets the foundation directly: “Only from the depths of our spiritual bankruptcy can we look up to the One Who gives us all of the spiritual resources of the Kingdom.”

Pip: So being poor in spirit is not a deficit to fix — it’s the posture that opens everything. You can’t fill a cup you’re convinced is already full.

Mara: That logic carries straight into The Happy Mourners, which takes up the second beatitude. It makes a pointed distinction: the Christian response to grief is not avoidance or forced cheerfulness. The post puts it plainly — “The difference between Christian grief and worldly grief is not the absence of tears but the presence of hope.”

Pip: Which is a genuinely useful reframe. Grief is not the opposite of faith; it’s woven into the biblical record from David to Jeremiah to Jesus himself.

Mara: Meek, Hungry, and Thirsty covers the third and fourth beatitudes together, and it links them to a shared pressure point — watching injustice in the world and feeling the pull to act. The argument is that meekness is strength held under God’s control, and that hunger for righteousness is blessed precisely because it aligns us with God’s own longing before any human action follows.

Pip: Trust over reaction. That’s a harder ask than it sounds when the news is on.

Mara: For Mercy’s Sake takes the fifth beatitude and digs into the Greek word eleos, tracing how it became layered with the Hebrew chesed — lovingkindness, unfailing love — when the Septuagint was written. The upshot is that the mercy Jesus calls us to show is not a polite courtesy; it carries the full weight of Romans 5:8, God acting toward us while we were still sinners.

Pip: Mercy as a theological posture, not just a temperament. That’s the through-line — each beatitude is less about behavior and more about what you’re oriented toward.

Mara: And that orientation has a starting point, which is where the series itself begins.

Kingdom Living as the Foundation

Pip: Before any individual beatitude, there’s a framing question: what kind of kingdom are we even talking about?

Mara: Kingdom Living, the introductory post, answers that with a striking piece of context: “Of the 162 times the word ‘kingdom’ is used in the New Testament, 150 times it refers to the Kingdom of Heaven, the Kingdom of God, etc. — 55 of those 150 are found in the Book of Matthew.”

Pip: Matthew is not incidentally interested in the kingdom. It is the whole gospel message.

Mara: And the post draws a direct parallel — early Christians learning to live as Kingdom citizens under Roman occupation, and readers today navigating a world the text calls controlled by “the prince of the air.” The Sermon on the Mount is the instruction manual either way.

---

Pip: Spiritual bankruptcy, hope inside grief, strength under control, mercy that costs something — these beatitudes keep pointing inward before they point outward.

Mara: More of the Sermon on the Mount is ahead. There’s still a lot of Matthew 5 through 7 to cover from the back porch.